Force Structure – Tech Com Forces Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:09:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Force Structure – Tech Com Forces 32 32 The sudden pivot from the United States to Asia throws Europe off balance Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:09:10 +0000

There are deeper questions about America’s future reliability as a security partner, especially if the conflict with China becomes kinetic, which is part of Mr. Macron’s argument, Mr. Lesser acknowledged. . “For all of the United States’ commitment to Europe, if things go wrong in the Indo-Pacific, it would change the force structure in Europe quite quickly.”

In Poland, a strong American ally in the European Union and NATO, the reaction to the new alliance has been more positive, focusing not on a pivot far from Europe “but on the United States, with the Brits and Australians, taking China seriously and also defending the free world, ”said Michal Baranowski, who heads the German Marshall Fund’s office in Poland.

At the same time, he said, the Poles see another case where the supposedly professional and pro-European Biden administration “fails to consult and puts European allies under the bus,” he said. “This time the French, but for us it was Nord Stream 2, when we were thrown under the bus for Germany,” he said. It was a reference to Mr Biden’s decision to allow the completion of a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, bypassing Ukraine and Poland, which was a priority for European Central Berlin.

“The United States will say again, ‘We are building strong alliances, with Germany and Australia,’” said Baranowski. “But who is suffering? Other allies.

As for relations with China, Europeans would rather not be angry with Beijing, said Ms. Balfour of Carnegie Europe. “European allies have been more uncomfortable with more hawkish stances on China” and “very much aware of the need to talk to China about climate and trade,” she said.

So if Europe can keep talking to Beijing without being described by China as having signed a security pact against it, that could be helpful, she said. “If there is a silver lining to that, it will be if the European Union is able to play this card diplomatically, and avoid painting the world as for or against China, which is the rhetoric Beijing is pushing. “

Source link

]]> 0
Parents protest mask’s mandate in Swan Valley school district Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:51:00 +0000

SAGINAW COUNTY, Mich. (WJRT) – Parents in Swan Valley speak out on mask warrant.

“Our children shouldn’t be forced to think that everyone around them is sick and dangerous and that their air is toxic to breathe. It prepares them for paranoid psychological damage, ”a parent said at Thursday’s Board of Education meeting.

Their reaction comes just a day after the Saginaw County School District demanded that all students, staff and visitors mask themselves inside school buildings.

Before the parents spoke to the council, dozens of them gathered for a peaceful protest at the entrance to the high school.

Melissa Thurston was organizing the protest ahead of the meeting and she says she is a nurse and wants the board to consider an alternative to masking.

“In fact, there was recently a mandatory proposal where we parents obviously voted for more money for our school systems, so I’m asking that we use that money and see a hygienist. industrial. They will come out in our school buildings. They’ll do a health risk assessment and tell us what she should use, ”Thurston said.

Thurston says she wants to focus more on environmental controls in schools, like using filter systems and improving ventilation.

She was supported by other parents who had other reasons to protest the mask’s mandate, holding signs that read “Freedom, not strength”, “Unmask our children” and “My body, my choice”.

A board member, Kevin Shanks, told the meeting that as of last week, 191 students and teachers were in home quarantine or had to be tested for antigen every day.

Right now, he says masks are needed to avoid another round of blended or distance learning.

A parent and district employee accepts and supports the district mask mandate to ensure children’s safety and schooling.

“My son alone struggled with virtual learning, and I know a lot of other kids have. They are not getting the education they need. They are not getting the structure they need. They don’t get the help they need, and then they don’t get the social interactions, ”King said.

ABC12 spoke with the Chairman of the Board after the meeting. He didn’t want to go on camera, but even after hearing from the community, he still upholds the board’s decision to keep the mask’s mandate in place.

He says the district maintenance manager will get all the information from tonight’s meeting to review and move forward.

Copyright 2021 WJRT. All rights reserved.

Source link

]]> 0
Prefabrication of the financing of the federal shipbuilding project Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:27:06 +0000

Initial appropriation discussions are underway for fiscal 2022, with continued focus on federal shipbuilding programs. Things have been tough for the Navy as Congress raised questions about the president’s commitment to the Navy’s long-term shipbuilding program. Meanwhile, House owners are apparently focused on the continued successes of shipbuilding within the Maritime Administration and Coast Guard. With billions of dollars at stake, the US shipbuilding industry should be watching closely the development of next year’s finance bills.

Congress relies on Navy budget proposal
On June 17, 2021, the Navy released its report to Congress on the annual long-range plan for the construction of warships for Exercise (FY) 2022. The report, which is required by law to contain a detailed program for the construction of Navy combatant, support and auxiliary ships over the next 30 fiscal years, focusing instead on the President’s immediate budgetary request for fiscal year 2022. This approach, focused on immediate demand instead of a long-term plan, is typical of a new presidential administration in its first year. The Navy’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2022 called for total funding of $ 18.1 billion for the construction of eight new ships, including two Virginia-class attack submarines (SSNs); an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer (DDG-51); a Constellation-class frigate (FFG-62); a John Lewis class lubricator (TAO-205); two TATS tow, rescue and rescue vessels; and a TAGOS ocean surveillance vessel (X). The report contained limited details of the Navy’s long-term shipbuilding plan, simply indicating a long-term fleet ranging from 321 to 372 crewed combat forces ships, as well as 77 to 140 unmanned ships with no timeline. precise for the development of the fleet foreseen in the report.

Subsequent discussions apparently rejected the report’s fleet projections and instead remained focused on the 355-vessel fleet in the Navy’s force structure assessment in 2016. Indeed, the budget request and report to long term have been the subject of significant criticism in Congress, with the House Appropriations Committee ultimately seeking to add funds for a second Arleigh Burke-class destroyer in the Department of Defense appropriations bill for fiscal year 2022. The Committee has been extremely critical of the President’s budget request and its impact on the shipbuilding industry. The committee report accompanying the supply bill stated, “The committee is appalled by the Navy’s decision to remove a DDG-51 Flight III destroyer from the budget request for fiscal year 2022. For the second consecutive fiscal year, the Navy chose to remove a major vessel from the budget request rather than make difficult funding decisions in a budget constrained environment. This represents a troubling tendency to underfund vessel acquisition programs and then demand that the withdrawn vessel be the highest priority on the unfunded priority list. In addition, the ship’s withdrawal from the budget request breaks the program’s multi-year supply contract, which has a negative impact on the already fragile national shipbuilding industrial base. The Senate Armed Services Committee apparently shares the view of House owners, adding $ 1.7 billion to its National Defense Authorization Act increase for fiscal year 2022 (fiscal year 2022 NDAA) to clear the second Arleigh Burke class destroyer.

NSMV and Coast Guard funding continues
While the Navy’s shipbuilding program comes under scrutiny by Congress, the reception has been much more positive for the Maritime Administration (MARAD). Building on MARAD’s initial success in the ongoing construction of the first four National Security Multi-Mission Vessels (NSMV) under the supervision of Vessel Construction Manager (VCM) TOTE Services at the Philly Shipyard, the House Appropriations Committee is seeking funding the fifth NSMV for Cal Maritime. The Committee’s Markup of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriation Bill, released on July 20, would provide $ 315 million to fund the entire NSMV V, as well as $ 5 million for the NSMV program. aimed at assisting State Maritime Academies in making necessary lateral infrastructure improvements for the delivery of NSMVs.

Beyond the NSMV themselves, it’s clear that many federal leaders see the value of the NSMV design and the VCM approach. In its NDAA markup for FY2022, released on July 28, the House Armed Service Committee’s Subcommittee on Maritime Power and Projection Forces specifically identified the NSMV as the base to replace hospital ships in the House Armed Service Committee. Marine (T-AH). The subcommittee’s markup read: “The committee believes that as an alternative to maintaining the converted supertankers that were purchased in the mid-1970s, the Navy could take advantage of the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel (NSMV) that the Maritime Administration is currently procuring for the State Maritime Academies. By using the hull form and the NSMV production line, the Navy could minimize the design costs and schedule of the T-AH (X) which is slated to replace the current T-AHs. This strategy would also allow the Navy to carry over future costly maintenance availabilities onto existing T-AHs and provide replacement capability earlier than the current plan.

As a result, the subcommittee requested a briefing from the Secretary of the Navy on the feasibility of using the NSMV hull form to meet the needs of replacement vessels for Navy hospital ships.

The House Appropriations Committee markup of the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill also focuses on continuing the U.S. Coast Guard’s (USCG) shipbuilding programs. The bill would provide an additional $ 597 million to fund the construction of the fourth offshore patrol vessel (OPC) at Eastern Shipbuilding and long-lead materials for the fifth OPC. The USCG would also receive $ 170 million for a portion of the long lead time materials for a third polar safety cutter at VT Halter Marine to keep the procurement program on schedule.

While these fundraising bills are in their early stages, it is certainly a positive sign that the House Appropriations Committee has not only supported, but increased, the president’s budget requests for construction projects. naval. If this trend continues, fiscal 2022 could be a positive year for new federal shipbuilding projects.

Source link

]]> 0
Democratic divisions ignite over tax hikes and drug prices Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:55:51 +0000

WASHINGTON – On the eve of the self-imposed deadline Democrats to complete committee work on their massive social policy bill, tensions rose in their ranks on Tuesday over how to structure and implement it. finance.

Disagreements over whether to tax the vast fortunes of tycoons like Jeff Bezos and how to control prescription drug prices have become hot spots as Democrats try to rally around what could be expansion. the largest social safety net in half a century.

Democratic leaders insisted they were on track to complete their work this fall and reach a deal. But liberal lawmakers campaigned for bigger tax hikes on the ultra-rich in the package, while three moderate Democrats in the House threatened to derail efforts to advance their leaders’ plans for price controls. prescription drugs.

The suspension of disputes is an increasing competition for resources. Incorporating all of the party’s priorities into the initial price of $ 3.5 trillion fully funded over 10 years was always going to be onerous. But major lawmakers now demand lower spending totals and oppose tapping into certain revenue streams, making compromises more difficult.